时间:2022-02-12 17:32:14 点击: 次 来源:原创 作者:九弟新媒 - 小 + 大
他们自称国际知名公司(也说在中国有很多分公司),用英语(含法语)给位于中国本土的中国公司写信,根本就没有进行良好沟通的诚意,也是对我们公司及本人的不尊重(他们应该说中国话)。信件具体什么意思我基本看不懂,但是有域名,我便知道是律师函。 全文公开如下: Dear Sirs, We represent the French Company Accor, whose registered office is located at 82 rue Henri Farman, 92130 Issy-les-Moulineaux, France. Founded in 1967, Accor is today the world leader in economic and mid-scale hotels, and a major player in upscale and luxury hospitality services. Accor operates more than 4,100 hotels in 95 countries with over 570,000 rooms, under more than 20 different brands including RAFFLES, SOFITEL, ONEFINESTAY, FAIRMONT, MGALLERY, PULLMAN, SWISSOTEL, GRAND MERCURE, NOVOTEL, MAMA SHELTER, MERCURE and IBIS. Accor owns numerous trademarks NOVOTEL around the world, which are very well-known especially in the field of hospitality services. Our client has become aware of the registration and use of the ten following domain names: <novotel.live>, <novotel.store>, <novotel.fun>, <novotel.link>, <novotel.tech>, <novotel.site>, <novotel.space>, <novotel.online>, <novotel.top> and <novotel.shop>. These domain names reproduces entirely our client’s trademark NOVOTEL and associate it with the generic extensions <.live>, <.store>, <.fun>, <.link>, <.tech>, <.site>, <.space>, <.online>, <.top> and <.shop>, which do not prevent any likelihood of confusion. On the contrary, the composition of these domain names increase the likelihood of confusion with the well-known trademark “NOVOTEL” since Internet users may be led to believe that these domain names are endorsed by our client or will direct them to our client’s official websites. All of these domain names resolve to Chinese websites which reproduce the name of our client and the term “HOTEL”, that takes part of our client’s field of activity, as below: Our client has never granted you any authorization to use its trademark NOVOTEL and to register the domain names <novotel.live>, <novotel.store>, <novotel.fun>, <novotel.link>, <novotel.tech>, <novotel.site>, <novotel.space>, <novotel.online>, <novotel.top> and <novotel.shop>. Moreover, the Arbitration and Mediation Center of the World Intellectual Property Organization already ordered the transfer to our client of the domain names <novotel.fun>, <novotel.link>, <novotel.top>, <novotel.store>, <novotel.vip> and <novotel.work> that you owned in a previous dispute, on May 2, 2018 (Annex 1). Therefore, the registration of said domain names appears to constitute violation of the well-known trademark NOVOTEL and free riding. Consequently, and without prejudice to any damages that could be claimed, we request that you: - Immediately cease the use of these domain names; - Transfer these domain names to our client free of charge; Dreyfus & associés - 78 avenue Raymond Poincaré, 75116 Paris, France 3/3 - Undertake in writing, and on letterhead, not to use the trademark NOVOTEL under any form and inter alia as trademark, company name, business name, trade sign or domain name without prior written authorization. Unless you comply with our requests in writing within the next 8 (eight) days, our client will take all necessary measures to put an end to this infringement, including legal proceedings. We remain at the disposal of your legal advisor. Best regards | Mit freundlichen Grüßen | Bien cordialement Nathalie Dreyfus
Dreyfus & associés - Paris | Lyon | Strasbourg Conseils en Propriété Industrielle - Intellectual Property Attorneys 78 avenue Raymond Poincaré - 75116 Paris – France Tel. +33 (0)1 44 70 07 04 - Fax +33 (0)1 40 06 99 64 www.dreyfus.fr - contact@dreyfus.fr
CONFIDENTIEL : Ce message contient des informations confidentielles protégées par le secret professionnel. Si vous l'avez reçu alors qu'il ne vous était pas destiné, vous devez le détruire immédiatement sans en garder de copie, ni le révéler ou le transmettre à une autre personne. PRIVILEGED & CONFIDENTIAL: This message contains privileged and confidential information. If you have received it although you were not the intended recipient, you must destroy it immediately, without keeping any copy, nor disclosing it or transmitting it to any other person. 备注: 附件2为2018年仲裁结论,作为法国 Accor 公司的证据,原则上是非常有力的,但是仲裁结论有几点明显歪曲事实: 1.................... 事实是,这是公司行为,公司有这个资质,个人没有。 2.................... 专家组(所谓专家组就一个人)不承认 novotel 含义的解释 3.................... 进一步歪曲“公司”的事实。(如上) 4.................... novotel 商标仅仅是个旅馆、饭店 而本公司使用域名是新媒体通讯领域,不在他的权利范围...... 5.................... 更多详见 起诉状
|
上一篇:novotel 酒店不配拥有novotel 域名——仲裁掠走后的 novotel.top 掉了
下一篇:没有了